POPULARITY
A to Z
Start with Emma’s Top 100 girl-name catalogue if a long directory makes it difficult to notice your favourites. This is a compact browsing category, not a verified 2025 Canadian ranking. Its displayed order should not be read as an official national result.
Read once without comparing positions. Mark the names you would genuinely consider, then cover the list and see which ones you can recall. This is a preference exercise, not a memory test: a name you need to reread may still be worth keeping. The point is to separate your reaction to a name from your reaction to a number beside it.
For any favourite, record the exact spelling before looking up frequency. A national result answers a different question from how a name sounds with your surname. You can broaden the search with the Top 1000 catalogue, explore the rare-name category, or return to the baby-name guide without treating any category as a recommendation to follow.
The ranking is not the roll call
Imagine making two cards for the same favourite. One card shows only the name; the other adds its statistical rank. Read the plain card first and write your reaction. Then uncover the rank. If your opinion changes, ask whether you are looking for familiarity, avoiding repeated names, or assuming that a popular choice has been approved by other parents.
That distinction matters because an annual national result is not a prediction about your child’s classroom. It also cannot tell you whether people around you will know the spelling. Keep those questions separate rather than letting one number answer all of them.
| Your question | A useful kind of evidence | What it cannot settle |
|---|---|---|
| Which name led Canada? | A national table with a reference year | Your favourite spelling or sound |
| Will it be repeated locally? | Relevant local data, where available | A particular classroom’s future roll call |
| Do I want to use it? | Your own full-name rehearsal | Any objective ranking of taste |
Canada and the United States: separate 2025 views
Charlotte ranked first among girls in Canada in 2025, according to Statistics Canada. The US Social Security Administration’s 2025 results put Olivia, Charlotte and Emma first, second and third among girls in its US-birth application data. Those are dated observations, not a 2026 forecast.
| Name | US rank | US count |
|---|---|---|
| Olivia | 1 | 13,544 |
| Charlotte | 2 | 13,400 |
| Emma | 3 | 12,754 |
Source: US Social Security Administration, 2025 names, consulted October 4, 2026. These are US birth-related Social Security card applications, not Canadian records. The separate panels deliberately have no shared volume axis: populations and administrative coverage differ. This comparison is not an official ranking of the catalogue or a prediction about future classmates.
The chart’s Canadian leader and US top-three panels are deliberately separate. They do not establish official positions for the rest of Emma’s catalogue. Canadian name data uses the first given name, removes accents and omits frequencies below five; figures can be revised. Keep that context beside any frequency you save.
Two common questions
Is the most popular name the safest choice?
A rank does not measure suitability. Try the spelling, initials and spoken full name before deciding how much frequency matters.
Can I choose a name outside this category?
Yes. A smaller catalogue is a starting point, not a boundary for your shortlist.
